Close
Updated:

California Court Discusses the Impact of Bankruptcy Stays on Litigation

In civil litigation involving defendants who file for bankruptcy, automatic stays under the Bankruptcy Code can complicate the proceedings. A recent California decision illustrates how courts handle the interplay between bankruptcy stays and ongoing civil cases. If you are navigating a case involving bankruptcy, it is crucial to consult a knowledgeable California bankruptcy attorney to assess your legal options.

History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiffs, acting as successors in interest to the decedent, filed a wrongful death action in federal court against the defendant and other parties. Allegedly, the claims arose from the decedent’s death while in custody, which the plaintiffs attributed to negligence and deliberate indifference by the defendants. The first amended complaint sought damages for violations of constitutional rights, wrongful death, and medical malpractice.

Reportedly, in November 2024, the defendant filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Shortly thereafter, the defendant filed a suggestion of bankruptcy and notice of stay, prompting the federal court in California to vacate a scheduling conference and consider the applicability of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). The court initially directed the plaintiffs to file a status report within ten days of any modifications to the bankruptcy stay.

Subsequently, the court reconsidered its approach, vacating the status report requirement and issuing an order to show cause as to whether the entire action should be stayed pending resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings. The court also directed Fresno County and the Fresno County Sheriff’s Department to file notices regarding their positions on the potential stay of the entire case.

Bankruptcy Stays and Litigation

The court began by noting that under Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of a bankruptcy petition automatically stays all judicial, administrative, and other proceedings against the debtor that were initiated before the bankruptcy filing. This provision is intended to provide a breathing spell for debtors, allowing them to reorganize or liquidate their assets without the pressure of ongoing litigation. Accordingly, the court confirmed that all claims against Wellpath LLC were stayed.

However, the court emphasized that the automatic stay under Section 362(a) does not extend to non-debtor defendants, such as Fresno County and the Fresno County Sheriff’s Department. The court explained that bankruptcy courts lack the authority to stay proceedings against non-debtors unless specific circumstances justify such an extension. The court declined to extend the stay to the non-debtor defendants, finding no basis to do so under the facts presented.

The court also analyzed whether an inherent stay under the Landis doctrine was warranted. The Landis doctrine permits courts to stay proceedings to promote judicial economy and avoid inconsistent rulings in cases involving related issues. To determine whether a Landis stay was appropriate, the court weighed competing interests, including potential prejudice to the plaintiffs and the efficiency of resolving overlapping issues in a single forum. Ultimately, the court deferred its decision on a Landis stay and directed the parties to submit further briefing.

In its ruling, the court reaffirmed the automatic stay’s application to the defendant and directed the parties to clarify their positions regarding the continuation of claims against the non-debtor defendants.

Talk to a Skilled California Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy filings can significantly impact civil litigation, particularly in cases involving multiple defendants. If you are involved in a lawsuit and intend to file for bankruptcy, it is vital to understand how the automatic stay and related doctrines may affect your case. Matthew D. Roy is an experienced California bankruptcy attorney who can provide the guidance and representation you need. To schedule a consultation with Mr. Roy, contact us online or call (916) 361-6028.

Contact Us